MedTech Leading Voice newsletter, issue 175

Four of this week's posts touch UDI, and two cover the same new MDCG 2026-5 guidance on who assigns the identifier when a device moves from manufacturer to distributor. Traceability has stopped being a data-entry task and become a question about who owns the record.
β Sean Smith
MDCG 2026-5 guidance on UDI assignment between manufacturers and distributors
Hatem Rabeh detailed MDCG 2026-5, the new guidance covering UDI assignment responsibilities for manufacturers and distributors. It sets out which party carries the obligation to assign the UDI-DI.
For MedTech teams, this is the week's most concrete compliance item. Elevate MedTech covered the same guidance from the manufacturer side, and Tibor Zechmeister's walkthrough of UDI fundamentals and their role in MDR traceability sits underneath it. If you sell through distributors or private-label partners, the assignment question is worth settling before your next registration.
Beyond the Protocol: A Realistic Resource and Planning Guide for Human Factors Validation Success
Ask a manager how long a Human Factors Validation takes and you may hear "you ran the sessions, just write up the data." Anyone who has run one knows the report is where the work happens. Root cause analysis, clear links to use-related risk, and evidence a reviewer can follow.
Denise Forkey and Leya Bergquist of ClariMed are joined by Kira Favakeh of Medtronic for what HF Validation actually requires: how to set a credible timeline, prepare the study team, decide where added investment prevents expensive rework, and make the case to the people who control the budget. They will also take the question that comes up most, which is what to do when the schedule will not move.
Thursday, August 6, 2026 at 11:00 AM ET. Live online, recording sent to all registrants.
July 27, 2026 | From Marcus Engineering, LLC
72 clearances this week, including 27 first-time clearances (π).
Featured first-time clearances:
Monday, 27 July 2026 | By Martin King
Clinical Research Modernisation, Regulatory Convergence and Digital Governance Define This Week's Global Regulatory Landscape
Martin's read is that this week's publications keep pushing toward risk-based, internationally harmonised, and digitally enabled regulation. He points to developments in ICH E6(R3), clinical trials, Good Manufacturing Practice, Health Technology Assessment, regulatory reliance, AI governance, and cybersecurity as evidence that regulators are folding clinical governance, quality management, digital transformation, and lifecycle oversight into their frameworks.
His priority list for organisations: GCP implementation, quality management systems, regulatory intelligence, submission quality, regulatory reliance, AI and cybersecurity governance, and continuous lifecycle compliance. He singles out clinical research modernisation, pharmaceutical quality, regulatory convergence, risk-based regulation, and global harmonisation as the capabilities becoming fundamental expectations across pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and IVDs.
Designing Electronic Medical Devices That Actually Reach Production
AndrΓ© DiMino ran an unusually interactive Friday In-Focus session on designing electronic devices for production. Audience polls surfaced where programs most often run into trouble, and participants added their own cases involving obsolete components, electrical-safety failures, poor production yield, materials, testing, and cybersecurity. The lesson underneath all of it: manufacturability decisions made early determine whether a working prototype can be produced consistently, compliantly, and at a viable cost.
Watch the replay >> | Get AndrΓ©'s slides >>
The Project Medtech Startup Symposium is at Quorum at the Science Center in Philadelphia on August 26, in collaboration with Penn Health-Tech. Use code MLV20 for 20% off.
Sean π
Also published on LinkedIn: issue 175.