MedTech Leading VoiceMaking MedTech expertise visible

MedTech Leading Voice newsletter, issue 183

FDA Proposes eSTAR for PMA Submissions

Published 27 September 2026Author Sean SmithIssue 183

MedTech Leading Voice - Issue 183 From the Editor On September 18, FDA issued draft guidance proposing eSTAR as the electronic submission format for PMA applications and supplements. Michelle Lott and Marina Daineko both covered it this week.

MedTech Leading Voice - Issue 183

πŸ“ From the Editor

On September 18, FDA issued draft guidance proposing eSTAR as the electronic submission format for PMA applications and supplements. Michelle Lott and Marina Daineko both covered it this week. Martin King's roundup carries the detail: technical screening within 15 calendar days, and up to 360 days to respond if a submission fails.

β€” Sean Smith

🧠 Featured Post

FDA's proposed eSTAR requirements for PMA submissions

Michelle Lott clarified FDA's proposed eSTAR requirements for PMA submissions and what they mean for review readiness. Under the draft, a submission that fails technical screening goes on hold, and resubmission restarts the review clock at Day 0. Once the guidance is final, FDA intends a transition period of at least one year. After that, designated applications not submitted electronically will not be considered received unless an exemption applies.

The scope covers Original PMAs, Panel-Track, 180-Day and Real-Time Supplements, and 30-Day Notices/135-Day Supplements.

PMA Modules and Modular Shells are excluded. Marina Daineko summarized the same eSTAR update in her weekly Monday News, and Martin King's roundup lists the draft under FDA. Comments are due within 60 days of the Federal Register notice. Any team with a PMA in the pipeline should read this before starting its next submission.

View the post >>

πŸ“Œ This Week's Top Posts (In no special order)

🎯 Featured Event

Tuesday, September 29, 2026, 11:00 AM ET β€” Sex Bias in Medical Device Usability Testing: The Human Factors Risk

Women made up about a third of participants across 195 medical device trials. In a 2019 ICIJ analysis of 340,000 FDA device injury and death reports, 67% of the people harmed were women.

A usability study can recruit an even split of men and women, pass every task, and still ship a failure that only affects some of them, because nobody cut the results that way. Aarti Swaminathan, Human Factors Manager at ClariMed, covers where sex bias enters design and testing. Diane LegereRN, BSN, MSc, APCCN, Clinical Evaluation Specialist at DNV, covers where it gets caught in review, and what post-market data shows when it was missed.

Register Now >>

πŸ—“οΈ Upcoming Events & Webinars

🎟️ Upcoming Conferences

πŸ’₯ Weekly 510(k) Roundup

September 21, 2026 | From Marcus Engineering, LLC

75 clearances this week, including 30 first-time clearances (πŸš€).

Featured clearances:

Explore the update >>

πŸ“‹ Regulatory Roundup

21 September 2026 | By Martin King

Martin King reads this week as a mix of requirements already in force and developments to assess, across medicines, medical devices and IVDs. Several need immediate attention:

To assess, EMA's ICH E14/S7B (R1) Q&As apply from 23 October, and EMA's draft GI interactions guideline is open for comment until 31 December. Also in this group are Egypt's draft ATMP framework, new EU HTA JCA templates for patient, carer and clinical-expert input, and EMA's review of its API inspection programme. On the strategic watch list are the first eight European Digital Product Passport standards, HSA's expanded reliance cooperation with Saudi Arabia, Africa, Malaysia and the UK, and TGA guidance on computational modelling and simulation. The list also includes FDA's CDRH Regulatory Reliance Portal and MHRA and MDSAP updates. The index also covers HPRA's 2025 annual report, MedTech Europe's reaction to the EU Procurement Regulation, NIST IR 8587, NMPA's BCI EEG dataset standard, SAHPRA's registry and eCTD programme, FDA's PMA eSTAR and buffy coat guidance, and two WHO reports. This edition is a flipbook, with every source reachable by QR code or through the Index of Indexes.

Explore the update >>

🎀 In Case You Missed It

Testing Software to Prove It Works

Last Friday on Friday In-Focus, Kris Kelly, CEO of, opened with the rise of Class I recalls, up 232% between 2020 and 2025. He also covered the point most people get backwards: a Class I recall is not a Class I device. He then walked through his process for finding the failures requirements-based testing is not built to catch. It relies on cross-functional teams that put clinical, software, quality and support in one room to generate scenarios together. 239 registered and more than 130 joined live from 29 countries.

"Most Class I recalls are in Class II devices. And the recalls in this session are Class I, which means the FDA judged that somebody could have been seriously hurt or killed."

Kris Kelly, CEO, Keystone Medical Device Partners

Watch the replay >> | Download the slides >>

Sean 🐝


Also published on LinkedIn: issue 183.

This week's top posts

Latest issues

Recent sessions

← Every issue