MedTech Leading Voice newsletter, issue 155

A warning letter and a cyber disruption point to a deeper governance question across MedTech.
Manfred Maiers examines the FDA warning letter to Unomedical and what it reveals about supplier oversight inside distributed device environments. The failures described in the letter did not stay contained within a single company.
At the same time, my interview with Mark Omo on the Stryker cyberattack raises a parallel governance question. In connected medical device ecosystems, risk does not sit neatly inside one product or one system.
Taken together, these discussions point to the same structural reality. Oversight models must reflect the ecosystem in which devices actually operate.
โ Sean Smith
Manfred Maiers analyzes the recent FDA warning letter issued to Unomedical and its implications for risk management across the MedTech ecosystem.
The inspection identified more than 5,000 complaints related to leaking infusion sets, over 41,000 complaints closed without investigation due to missing lot numbers, inadequate process validation, and delayed adverse event reporting. Some reports included severe patient outcomes.
Maiers uses this case to examine how supplier performance, OEM oversight, complaint handling, and regulatory reporting operate within a shared device environment.
The article addresses:
Maiers' article frames risk as a system property shaped by supplier processes, OEM integration, complaint data, and lifecycle surveillance. Effective risk management requires governance structures that span the entire device ecosystem. View the post>>
March 12, 2026 | From Marcus Engineering, LLC
25 total clearances across multiple categories, including 4 first-time clearances (๐)
Explore the full list of this weekโs clearances on the 510(k) Roundup page.
March 09, 2026 | By Martin King
This weekโs regulatory developments reflect expanding reliance pathways, deeper lifecycle oversight, digital system integration, and structural adaptation to emerging science. Authorities and standards bodies advanced initiatives across ๐ SAHPRA, ๐ Swissmedic, ๐ Medical Device Authority Malaysia, ๐ Health Sciences Authority (HSA Singapore), ๐ European Medicines Agency (EMA), ๐ International Council for Harmonisation (ICH), ๐ International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF), ๐ ANVISA (Brazil), ๐ U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), and ๐ Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
Across regions, regulators formalised cross-authority reliance mechanisms, including SAHPRAโs ZAZIBONA pathway and Swissmedicโs Article 13 route, leveraging EMA and FDA assessments. EMA expanded PSUR, RMP, and PASS oversight alongside DARWIN EU real-world data infrastructure. Digital regulatory architecture advanced through Brazilโs SIUD UDI launch, Swissmedicโs Swissdamed platform, updated IMDRF terminology, and new SG-eCTD specifications in Singapore. Agencies also progressed frameworks supporting microbiome-based therapies, rare disease programs, and advanced evidence models.
Friday, March 13, 2026 | 11:00 AM ET โ Designing Better Formatives: Simulated Use, Realism, and the Risks of Playing It Safe, featuring Davide Salanitri, Senior Human Factors Engineer Manager, ClariMed, and Denise Forkey, Director, Human Factors Strategy โ Advisory, ClariMed, examined how formative study design choices shape risk visibility, study quality, and downstream regulatory outcomes. The discussion covered simulated use realism, environmental fidelity decisions, documentation of findings, and how early human factors strategy influences safety, usability, and submission readiness. Watch the replay >>
Join us live every Friday at 11 a.m. ET for MLVx
Also published on LinkedIn: issue 155.